No rain, but still no play: Lauderhill washouts prompt questions over ground's preparedness

Yes there was a lot of rain in Florida this past week, but at the ground, over two days of washouts, there was hardly more than 30 minutes of serious rain. Could the organisers have done better?

On a macro level, the T20 World Cup 2024 is a grand success. After a long time, a World Cup seems like a World Cup . Twenty teams have taken part in it to start with. The event has been brought to a new country, the capital of capitalism. Afghanistan and co-hosts USA have made it through to the Super Eight. One of the qualifiers from Group D will not be from the top two seeds, and England are on a knife's edge in Group B. There have been ties and many a close match. There is representation, there is unpredictability, matches have been tight if not high-scoring, and there are conditions creating jeopardy for the more established teams.

On a micro level, though, some of what has happened has bordered on the embarrassing. Since 8.30am on Friday, the day Florida was starting to host three back-to-back matches, there has been only about 30 minutes of serious showers - we can't confirm there wasn't the odd light drizzle outside of this, but we're talking proper rain here - at the Central Broward Regional Park Turf Ground. And yet, we have had no play either on Friday or Saturday. Sunday looks dicey too, because one particular part of the outfield is still soft underfoot.

It is difficult to explain no play despite no rain to hardcore cricket fans, leave alone to America, or even the diaspora here who have so many other options. That one side of the ground has drained means the drainage in one part of the ground is good, but not so good in the other. This is hurricane season in Florida and, despite the unprecedented amount of rain received here in the last week, to not repair the drainage before a World Cup should be unacceptable.

Quite often, when drainage is not great, cricket stadiums cover the whole playing surface, but here they don't have any more covers than the ones covering the square and the bowlers' run-ups. That, for a World Cup, is not a good look.

Quite often, when drainage is not great, cricket stadiums cover the whole playing surface, but here they don't have any more covers than the ones covering the square and the bowlers' run-ups. That, for a World Cup, is not a good look. You wonder how the ICC's commercial partners feel about this.

This is not to make light of the record rainfall the area has received in the days leading up the matches. There have been flash floods in and around southern Florida, leading to serious losses. Cricket is nothing in comparison. The groundstaff have tried their best on the day, but there was no way the umpires, who are in charge of player safety, could okay play.

Again it is not about the effort but the equipment. Not that it would have had any impact on the games, but the Super Sopper ran out of fuel on Friday afternoon (insert irony jokes about the USA running out of fuel) and then broke down, only repaired later in the evening. That the Broward County, in charge of the stadium, doesn't have more covers should not come as news to the ICC. That should be part of preparations.

All this left the teams mildly frustrated. For Pakistan, the No. 2 seeds in Group A, it was imperative that the games on Friday and Sunday go ahead if they were to have any chance to progress to the Super Eight. For India, who played all their matches in the treacherous batting conditions of New York, it was a chance to get used to better conditions before the more crucial matches. For Canada, USA and Ireland, it was yet another day in the bright lights before they are forgotten for two more years.

The Super Sopper at work in Lauderhill on Saturday - on Friday, it had issues • ICC/Getty Images

"As a team we wanted to play," India's batting coach Vikram Rathour said. "You are right, when you are in a tournament like the World Cup, you want to carry on playing cricket, so as a team you don't want to lose the momentum that you've gained. But again, conditions, I don't know whether it rained here or not. The place we were staying at, it didn't really rain yesterday. So again, not for me to say how and what happened, but yeah, it's disappointing that we can't get it going.

"We were really looking forward to play a game and we were expecting better batting conditions than what we got in New York. So as a team I think it was important for us to get a game but, again, something that we can't control, we don't control. So, it's unfortunate that we couldn't get a game here."

India will now go from a week of no cricket to playing three Super Eight matches in five days in three different Caribbean islands. Rathour could just shrug and say it is not ideal.

"I think the next time ICC will review this, that the ground should be completely covered, so as soon as the rain stops, we can play the match." Pakistan's Imad Wasim

Pakistan of course don't want to be seen using this an excuse, and they shouldn't have left themselves in such a situation, but their allrounder Imad Wasim did say the ICC needed to review the situation. "This depends on ICC, how they will review this," Imad said when asked about the ground not being fully covered. "I think, if the wicket and square is dry… I'll give you one reason, when we play in Sri Lanka or any other place, they cover the entire ground. And the venue where the game is being played, there are around 20-30-35 people to take care of this. I think the next time ICC will review this, that the ground should be completely covered, so as soon as the rain stops, we can play the match."

It is not like established cricket centres are always fully prepared to ensure viewers get as much cricket as they can. As an extreme example, as recently as 2016, a Test match in Port-of-Spain couldn't be played despite no rain on the days of the match because of poor drainage, but the venue received due criticism and poor ratings , which have consequences in the future.

There was some informal talk among people at the ICC about possibly swapping the 2030 T20 World Cup in England with this one, but it was a non-starter because England's summer is planned seemingly decades in advance. And there is never going to be the "perfect time" to break new ground so the ICC can't be blamed for pushing for this even if it did so with less-than-perfect conditions to play in.

The stadium in Dallas, run by Major League Cricket (MLC), showed it was well prepared - it had play and in great conditions despite unprecedented rains leading up to, and even on the afternoon of, the first matchday . The same can't be said of the facility in Lauderhill, run by the Broward County. Despite its best intentions, the ICC has left itself vulnerable to criticism by not taking over ground preparation more actively.