Saturday , Oct. 5, 2024, 12:56 a.m.
News thumbnail
Nation / Sat, 06 Apr 2024 The Indian Express

Sonam Wangchuk withdraws call for march to LAC, cites ‘suppression’ attempts, govt ‘overreaction’

Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk has withdrawn the call for “Pashmina March” from Leh to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on Sunday. Wangchuk cited “risk of potential violence” as the reason for the decision, as the Union Territory administration has imposed Section 144 of the CrPC in the area. AdvertisementSpeaking to reporters on Saturday, Wangchuk said, “We have been holding peaceful demonstrations in the form of fasting and prayers over the last 35 days. Before cancelling the march, Wangchuk had on Saturday raised concern over alleged detention of youths in Leh and “being made to sign bonds” among other restrictions. AdvertisementEmphasising that the government’s “overreaction” is itself a give-away for “how much they have to hide”, Wangchuk said the people of Ladakh are connected with this movement.

Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk has withdrawn the call for “Pashmina March” from Leh to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on Sunday.

Wangchuk cited “risk of potential violence” as the reason for the decision, as the Union Territory administration has imposed Section 144 of the CrPC in the area.

Wangchuk, who recently sat on a 21-day fast seeking safeguards for Ladakh’s fragile ecology and local culture, had called for a people’s march to the China border on April 7 “to see how much land locals have lost to them”. The march was to be led by local tribal leaders.

Advertisement

Speaking to reporters on Saturday, Wangchuk said, “We have been holding peaceful demonstrations in the form of fasting and prayers over the last 35 days. We had also planned a peaceful march on April 7. The purpose of the Pashmina March was to highlight the plight of the Changpa nomadic tribes who are losing thousands of square kilometres of their land due to Chinese incursion in the north and our own corporates in the south.”

Stating that the “purpose of the march had been met ahead of the march itself”, he said there’s “suppression” attempts and “overreaction” on part of the government, “under these circumstances chances of violence are very high, which could then be used to label this peaceful movement anti-national”. The ongoing peaceful fast will, however, continue, he added.

Wangchuk said with the imposition of Section 144, curtailment of Internet and restrictions on movement, the UT administration had turned Leh “into a war-like zone with armed barricades” on roads.

Before cancelling the march, Wangchuk had on Saturday raised concern over alleged detention of youths in Leh and “being made to sign bonds” among other restrictions. “Even from the site of our protest, people were picked up and asked to sign bonds,” he said. After discussions with religious leaders, the locals were let off by the police, said the activist.

Advertisement

Emphasising that the government’s “overreaction” is itself a give-away for “how much they have to hide”, Wangchuk said the people of Ladakh are connected with this movement. “All they are trying to do is remind the government of their promises.”

logo

Stay informed with the latest news and updates from around India and the world.We bring you credible news, captivating stories, and valuable insights every day

©All Rights Reserved.